Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/She (Maldoror album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:15, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

She (Maldoror album)[edit]

She (Maldoror album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 13:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable album by a non-notable band. The band's article (Maldoror) just got deleted because of the lack of reliable sourcing. The band had two notable members, yet they did not receive notable media coverage. Same could be said about the album. The only thing that establishes notability is an Allmusic review, and that's it. The rest of the results are the standard trash (you know, databases like discogs and rateyourmusic, youtube, streaming links like spotify, and retail sites). At first I thought this could make it, but the first sentence ("Ah sh.t, I forgot about this one") already proved me that this is not a professional review, and the rest of the text isn't any better either. So yeah, we only have one good source and that's not enough. Unnotable album. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 13:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 13:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 13:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 January 23. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I was going to nominate this article for deletion but Ghost Destroyer beat me to it. Beyond the nominator's comments on sources, this can be considered a purely procedural nomination. That is because the album is now an orphan after the band's article was deleted a few days ago. I already tagged this album article for Speedy Deletion but it was turned down by an Admin because two notable people are on the album. Well that might make a difference in the Speedy Deletion process but the album remains non-notable in its own right and it is by a band that we have already decided is non-notable too. Meanwhile, I have added brief info about this album to the two musicians' pages, and that is all that Wikipedia needs. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:50, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The band itself is non-notable; the album doesn't warrant a standalone article given there is no significant coverage by multiple, reliable independent sources, except AllMusic. Ashleyyoursmile! 07:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.