Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaykh Muhammad Sarwar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shaykh Muhammad Sarwar[edit]

Shaykh Muhammad Sarwar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An Islamic Shia scholar and former representative of Shia marja' Abu-al-Qasim al-Khoei in the United States until 1982, article only lists two sources one of which is an Amazon link to one of his book, fails WP:GNG. Last two works mentioned in the article do not appear to be written by him, and all except for first ones are translations of other works. Lolekek (talk) 23:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Islam, and Pakistan. Lolekek (talk) 23:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and New York. WCQuidditch 00:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete essentially this article consists of claims about the subject made by himself, supported by a single inaccessible link to something in a book on a much more general topic. I can see that he is the author of multiple books, but I don’t see any in depth third party coverage either of those books or of him as their author. There is a possibility that this is all simply made up or embellished, but even if it is all true, it hasn’t made him notable. Mccapra (talk) 07:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I see no WP:SIGCOV here. Idunnox3 (talk) 23:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.