Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Scallen (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was G7, Speedied. --humblefool® 21:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Shawn Scallen[edit]
I have nominated this subject for deletion again (I am the creator of the article) because the subject of the article wrote to me asking for me to take it down, and he barely passed "notability" requirements so I don't see that the article should have to remain, in the interests of his privacy. He has also been blanking the page but bots have been reverting it. I would ask to Delete at this point. Thanks-- Dan Carkner 16:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. But maybe there is a quicker process. According to speedyu deletion policy: "Any page for which deletion is requested by the original author, provided the page's only substantial content was added by its author and was mistakenly created. If the author blanks the page, this can be taken as a deletion request". Could "mistakenly created" be interpreted as the author mistakenly thinking that the subject wouldn't mind? If so, blank the page and then slap on a {{db-author}} tag. GringoInChile 17:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:BIO criteria. You could actually put {{db-author}}. --Terence Ong (C | R) 19:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete and tagged as such. --Howrealisreal 21:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.