Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn C. Phillips (3rd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn C. Phillips[edit]

Shawn C. Phillips (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted a (as far as my experience) record five times, each time on notability grounds, this article presents insufficient evidence of notability for this actor (with roles such as 'Barista' and 'Drug Dealer') and fails WP:GNG. This time around I'd respectfully advance an argument for delete and SALT. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Hello Alexandermcnabb First I want to thank you for your review because I truly appreciate it. I don't understand why Shawn C. Phillips page is being considered for deletion; other than the notes you made on this page "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn C. Phillips (3rd nomination)"? He has been in 55+ movies as co-star and lead character. Please make a note to yourself that I didn't even add all of them. There are way more movies than what I listed in this article and just about every film comes up on Google with notable articles/sources about them. Based on what I found on the web for him, he does meet general notability guideline / WP:GNG. Thanks! Vikiemoney (talk) 14:35, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 21:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, unless a suitable redirect target can be found as an ATD. He's a working actor, without any truly significant roles. Onel5969 TT me 14:53, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, has been deleted already several times. Might be worth reviewing previous AFDs.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete and salt, because not one but two previous nominations voted to delete, yet for whatever reason this article is still hanging around. Lengthy filmography, but it's mostly minor roles in non-notable B-movie schlock. Article cites primary sources with no independent third-party coverage of subject aside from puff pieces on niche movie sites. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 06:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Lack of significant coverage and multiple significant roles. Moresdi (talk) 14:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.