Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaunak Chakraborty (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:15, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shaunak Chakraborty[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NAUTHOR, at least two of the cited references are blog sites, which are generally unreliable sources. Was previously deleted via AfD, was recreated as draft and then moved to main space by the creator without any independent review. Dan arndt (talk) 10:52, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep At least one source is reliable that means the article is notable. It should not be delete. 2405:205:1085:1054:E47A:D82E:4B9:4603 (talk)

Comment, actually in order to be considered notable there should be significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 13:36, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - blogs, advertorials and routine announcements do not establish notability. WP:TOOSOON promotional article. GermanJoe (talk) 16:56, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment OK if it is too soon to create this article then it should be reversed to draft. Give more time to establish notability. 2405:205:1085:1054:E47A:D82E:4B9:4603 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:48, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it was previously created as a draft but the article’s creator moved it into the mainspace without any independent reviews/assessment, probably because they knew it wasn’t notable and was unlikely to be supported. Dan arndt (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think if it is too soon then this article may stay for a month or a couple of month for proving. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:1085:1054:E47A:D82E:4B9:4603 (talk) 18:47, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is no webhost to popularize young authors until they may become eventually notable, but to cover topics that are already notable by our standards. Please use other Internet venues to promote this author - there are really enough possibilities out there (social media, PR platforms, blogs, etc.). Please also disclose a possible conflict of interest if you have a personal or professional connection with this topic. GermanJoe (talk) 18:54, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Minimum how many reliable sources are required to established the notability? 2405:205:1085:1054:E47A:D82E:4B9:4603 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a matter of numbers, so stop adding references to user generated blogs. It is the reliability and independence of the sources added. 00:23, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Delete as there is not enough coverage. In addition, this link used as a reference is not reliable. Although the website shares its name with a TV Channel (Times Now), a closer look indicates that the website itself is self published. For example, the privacy page gives the contact email ending in "gmail.com". The poem in Amar Ujala is a submission that was published in the newspaper - not an article about the author. While I am not sure, I am suspicious that this is a bad faith attempt to create a page and is related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Theatre Calcutta. I have posted at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Shaunak_Chakraborty/Archive#31_January_2019 to let admins investigate.--DreamLinker (talk) 04:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you for informing now I am undoing the move action, move it back to draft and request Wikipedia to give some more time. If any error occurred then I request any administrator to do it for me. 2405:205:120C:754E:2F95:EF42:A240:E4BA (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:40, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I request the administrator note to delete this page but move back to draft and give some more time. Thank you 2405:205:120C:754E:2F95:EF42:A240:E4BA (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:43, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.