Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Golden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 05:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shaun Golden[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. WP:NN local politician. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Illia Connell (talk) 00:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. czar · · 00:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. czar · · 00:55, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete, subject has received multiple mentions in non-primary reliable sources, that being said I did not observe any mentions where the subject was given in-depth significant coverage, therefore I am of the opinion that the subject has not passed WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Now the reason I am not strongly supporting deletion is that the subject can be considered locally notable to the county where the subject is the Sheriff, and if this the case a redirect to the Sheriff Department maybe appropriate if the department has a list of sheriffs embedded in it.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. No list of sherriff but Monmouth County, New Jersey contains the one relevant piece of information already. Otherwise, fails WP:POLITICIAN and general guidelines.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 13:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sheriffs aren't notable for doing routine sheriffy things; you'd need substantial out-of-town coverage for notability, and that's not present. Nyttend (talk) 13:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Ray^Talk 16:39, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN and lacks the WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS to meet WP:GNG. Mkdw ^talk 08:15, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.