Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shatamanam Bhavati

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. King of ♠ 04:27, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shatamanam Bhavati[edit]

Shatamanam Bhavati (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:TOOSOON and WP:NF... Rameshnta909 (talk) 21:31, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 00:19, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E 13:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 14:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 14:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now as WP:TOOSOON. Has been announced but not released. No prejudice against re-creating in a week's time or so after release date (assuming it is actually released then). Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.