Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharsheret (organization)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:16, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sharsheret (organization)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The organization appears to be pretty small with nothing pointing toward its notability. Galatz ^Talk 20:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Galatz ^Talk 20:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Galatz ^Talk 20:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Galatz ^Talk 20:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 January 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A Gnews search for the organization name (without the disambiguation) yields sufficiently good coverage in a diverse range of publications across the U.S. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep needs expanding but it is notable and has good coverage. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 17:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sources available via a Google search go well beyond the minimum standard of notability. Alansohn (talk) 17:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.