Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Taylor (businesswoman)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 23:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Taylor (businesswoman)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This BLP appears to fail notability using WP:AUTHOR as I find no significant published works using google. She may be a well established professional, however based on publications I only see co-authored books that do not appear to be a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work. There may be a basis of notability if she is widely cited by her peers but I have found insufficient evidence for those grounds though a number of press releases and articles derivative of press releases can be found on GNews. Ash (talk) 12:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Ash (talk) 12:47, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- Ash (talk) 12:49, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Ash (talk) 12:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I'm not seeing a particularly strong claim of notability (or viable sources) here either. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 00:03, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources. Jujutacular ^T · C 01:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.