Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Profis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Profis[edit]

Sharon Profis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:JOURNALIST, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:GNG.

Notability was brought up at Wikipedia:Help desk#My page is inaccurate (and outdated) – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 21:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete For reasons given above.--Aspro (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – I looked for sources back in November and couldn't find any. I doubt any have appeared since then. Kendall-K1 (talk) 23:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Personal site is dead, no independent sources indicating notability per WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnkleFester (talkcontribs) 00:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. While certainly successful, I can't see where she's received the coverage necessary to pass NBIO, which is pretty difficult to pass in general. Most journalists don't receive coverage for themselves and Profis is not really any exception to this, despite having authored two books with CBS Interactive. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 18:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.