Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Miller (writer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Miller (writer)[edit]

Sharon Miller (writer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While accomplished, this writer simply does not rise to meet the criteria for notability. Was deprodded without improvement or rationale. Onel5969 TT me 12:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I believe this page should remain on Wikipedia. This was for a class project and the assignment was to research marginalized groups in the entertainment industry and create an article. It had to be someone who was not already recognized on Wikipedia in any way, shape or form (which is very hard to do). I chose Sharon Miller because she is an important woman in the entertainment industry and while she may not be as accomplished as other female writers, her work deserves recognition. - user:Conorjokelly
moved comment from talk page to discussion. Onel5969 TT me 01:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete When one of 4 sources is the LinkedIn page for the subject (not a reliable source) another is a book not about the subject and another is a release from their employer we are not passing GNG. Beyond this, I have to admit that I think articles written as school assignments are a very bad idea. This article in no way passes inclusion criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Fails WP:GNG. GauchoDude (talk) 23:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.