Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharmila Oswal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Go Phightins! 21:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sharmila Oswal[edit]

Sharmila Oswal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable enterpreneur and fails WP:GNG.Seems like written for promotional purpose.The creator of the article has been also blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Poppified talk 14:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Poppified talk 14:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Poppified talk 14:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Poppified talk 14:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Poppified talk 14:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom: I was already about to nominate this for AFD. Clearly fails WP:Basic. The user Speedy King has created some articles that is full of promotional contents. I am currently going through them all. Kichu🐘 Discuss 14:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per WP:HEY and WP:BASIC; I have revised the article and added sources - Oswal has WP:SUSTAINED news coverage as an expert and advocate in her role as the founder and President of the NGO Green Energy Foundation, and her work with the Jain International Trade Organisation. I have currently found news coverage spanning from 2009 through 2017, and it seems possible that additional sources WP:NEXIST. Beccaynr (talk) 18:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - on the basis of recent improvements.--Ipigott (talk) 10:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Times of India coverage is notable for that country and considered one of the major media, so it meets WP:GNG.Expertwikiguy (talk) 10:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep based on Beccaynr's recent improvements. ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.