Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharka Blue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:46, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sharka Blue[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory-like listing for an unremarkable performer. Significant RS coverage not found. Does not meet WP:NACTOR / WP:PORNBIO. Award category is not significant; "FICEB Ninfa Award winner - Best Supporting Actress" does not qualify. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no evidence of notability, hasnt won any significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:06, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another in a long line of non-notable pornographic film actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:06, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- fails WP:PORNBIO--Rusf10 (talk) 18:19, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.