Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ShapeIdeas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 01:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ShapeIdeas[edit]

Advert for a non-notable piece of software. Created by User:Shapeideas who has done no other edits. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, sigh, WP:VSCT. --- tqbf 03:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How non-notable? The page has also been edited by others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shapeideas (talk • contribs) 05:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC) Please read Dont' Say Non Notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shapeideas (talk • contribs) [reply]
There isn't one third-party reliable source in the article; that's how non-notable. --- tqbf 06:40, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vanispamifragilisticexpialidocious, no notability asserted so it's possibly a speedy. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 06:40, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It shouldn't be a speedy if it's already being contested in AfD. --- tqbf 16:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles under AFD aren't immune to speedy. Someguy1221 (talk) 23:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, but contested AfDs should be. --- tqbf 23:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An AFD being contested only by the article's creator is no more immune to speedy than a speedily tagged article contested by the article's creator (it's not). This article happens to be immune to speedy in any event because the subject doesn't fall under A7 (effectively what TPH suggested), and hasn't been shown to fall under other criteria. Someguy1221 (talk) 00:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of assertion of notability. Someguy1221 (talk) 23:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless reliable, independent, verifiable resources magically appear. Keeper | 76 23:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.