Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannon Muir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was userfy to User:Shannonmuir. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 00:19, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shannon Muir[edit]

Vanity bio of VERY minor animation production co-ordinator (created by Shannonmuir (talk · contribs), funnily enough). Calton | Talk 05:12, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:VAIN and WP:BIO. Royboy crashfan 05:18, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Royboy --Deville (Talk) 05:20, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Montco 05:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete is fine with me if that be majority rule. I'm learning my way around, no offense meant. The message that came up originally implied perhaps all you wanted was more information. I just know that I have made a lot of impact on people over the years but it's all a matter of perspective. Thank you for the exercise in humility. Shannonmuir

Left a comment on her userpage on the AfD process. T K E 06:59, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom (although it should be noted that this is fairly well-written and non-hagiographic, rare for a vanity page here). Joe 06:13, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps could be moved to the Shannonmuir user page if she wishes. Well written article but unfortunately she doesn't meet WP:BIO by my reckoning. Capitalistroadster 07:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I would be fine with moving it if that is workable, just let me know what needs to be done.--Shan 07:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. I don't know what I could add that hasn't already been said. TheDrinkNinja 08:00, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy as suggested above seems reasonable, if so desired. --Kinu ^t/_c 08:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy seems to be the best option here. Jud e (talk,contribs,email) 09:24, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy per above. Grand master ka 14:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - seems notable --Haham hanuka 19:36, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Weatherman90 21:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy as suggested above seems reasonable, if so desired.--Dangerous-Boy 05:26, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy sounds reasonable. Bobak 21:32, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.