Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannah Trailor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio 10:04, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shannah Trailor[edit]

Shannah Trailor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:NAUTHOR. BLPPROD-eligible when created, and was contested. The page had one footnote at the time I found it, which was a Worldcat link, but that on its own doesn't help notability, since Worldcat catalogues any book in any library (really, any media item in any library). I'm not seeing reviews/interviews/etc., but my WP:HEY standard is pretty low, so please inform if any are found. Chubbles (talk) 20:00, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:03, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:03, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete merely having your work published and getting it in a library somewhere is not in and of itself a sign of notability. We require reviewes or other forms of 3rd party, secondary sourcing on a writer that is substantial, and that is all lacking here. The fact that the article has existed with such little sourcing for 10 years, would be a bad sign for Wikipedia, but hey earlier this year I nominated for deletion an article that had existed for 16 years, so 10 years is not that badJohn Pack Lambert (talk) 20:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.