Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shanice Marcus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shanice Marcus[edit]

Shanice Marcus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally non-notable. Page was created in 2011 and immediately tagged for notability. Creator removed notability tag. I came across this as a random article and made some edits. In particular, I removed two claims that do not add up. Firstly, "Her first major movie role was in Franco-Canadian's Nos 18 ans." She is not listed in a major role or anywhere else as far as I can see. (And what/who is "Franco-Canadian's"?) Secondly, she is "known her portrayal of Nicole in the film Nos 18 ans"; ditto, plus there doesn't seem to be a Nicole part in the film!. The only reference given, to the NY Times, is not specific. Her website is all but blank. Which leaves that she went to an audition and appeared in a video - no refs. Total non-entity in a page that lacks substance and sources and appears no more than a (poor) attempt to promote a career that is at best lacklustre and more likely non-existant. Worth keeping in mind that there is no corresponding article in French Wikipedia. Emeraude (talk) 20:03, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above arguments by nominator Theprussian (talk) 20:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete when you most notable film role is a part that is so minor there is no clear evidence it exists you are not notable. And that is assuming the truthfulness of some claims that are nota actually proven.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:16, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails general notability guidelines. Missvain (talk) 01:45, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Clearly fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACTRESS. -- LACaliNYC 22:00, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: as per nomination. Dflaw4 (talk) 13:43, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.