Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Bettenhausen (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:03, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Shane Bettenhausen[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Shane Bettenhausen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The page was nominated a year ago with the consensus of keeping the article as long as it gets fleshed out. A year has passed since then and the article is even more of a stub now than it was year ago. Right now it reads more like a résumé for the person than an actual biography and personally I've seen no convincing reason to keep this page since it fails to assert notability. Jonny2x4 (talk) 05:40, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 21:01, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sources found in 2008 (first nomination) would still not be enough to pass WP:BIO, and any other sources I've found tend to simply mention him, rather than talk about him, which is what the original sources found did. --Teancum (talk) 12:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:42, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No improvements to article after a year. Still not up to Wiki standards and unlikely to be as no one is taking the time to improve the page. Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 00:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares[reply]
- Delete. Unremarkable person. Cannot find non-trivial sources. Christopher Connor (talk) 03:42, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This person is of no notability. Doesn't seem to be in any way a person in the Gaming industry who is considered to be notable. Yousou (talk) 19:11, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.