Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamim Azad (actor)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KaisaL (talk) 02:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shamim Azad (actor)[edit]

Shamim Azad (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:ENT. A Hindi stage actor based in Shahjahanpur. The Hindu source within the article is a review of a play that said his performance was good (among four others, not top billing within that list). The other sources (in Hindi) are about a local award at given at this high school (inter college = high school). Nothing in Hindi or English to show that the subject passes our notability guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 17:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 17:27, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 17:27, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails GNG. Not helping matters is the fact that the article's creator is a sock operator who apparently is here to promote himself and his small-time colleagues. This AfD notice removal is indicative of a pattern of disruptive behavior from this guy and his cronies. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The references is not show this...who that you saying...👆 you r going to near only imagine.....thats wrong.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.219.24.65 (talk) 07:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. If even the Hindu News has only a mention, there's no possible notability. DGG ( talk ) 15:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.