Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamily Sukumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. apparent consensus DGG ( talk ) 09:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shamily Sukumar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR: I see no evidence that any of her roles are "significant", and so far, no reliable sources have been found that discuss her life and career at any length. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:50, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:50, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep role on Ponnunjal (TV series) recurring according to its own article. Power~enwiki (talk) 18:07, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Power~enwiki: Do you have a reliable source to support your claim? I can't find a single source that talk about her character in Ponnunjal (TV series) even if she did appear as this character, the character is so minor as to be effectively not worth mentioning. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:03, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have no ability to do so, and believe only a Tamil speaker can do so. I would support a WP:JUNK deletion based on the fact that she doesn't have a page on the Tamil-language wikipedia. Power~enwiki (talk) 21:55, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:39, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. Most of her TV roles are minor ones and her film roles often go uncredited. The one in Pencil is a minor one too. Fails WP:NACTOR. --Skr15081997 (talk) 13:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Even if sourcing exists to validate Power-Enwiki's claim, that still would not raise it to the level of meeting WP:NACTOR. Clearly does not meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:54, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.