Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakthi Scott (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete for Shakthi Scott and delete without prejudice for Adhisaya Ulagam 3D. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shakthi Scott[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article deleted at AfD and recreated, but probably not recently enough for WP:SPEEDY. This subject is still not notable under WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE, or WP:ANYBIO because he is the subject of no substantial coverage by any reliable sources.

I am also adding the related article Adhisaya Ulagam 3D, by the same author (perhaps autobiographical) and featuring this actor, as failing WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFILM in addition to WP:BASIC criteria. JFHJr (㊟) 23:42, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An afterthought: if the closing admin deletes, please add WP:SALT. JFHJr (㊟) 00:24, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. JFHJr (㊟) 17:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. JFHJr (㊟) 17:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - both: bio fails WP:BIO; film fails WP:CRYSTAL. ukexpat (talk) 15:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Shakthi Scott. No further sources have become available since the last time this article was deleted.[1] The young filmmaker exists, but is still receiving no coverage in reliable sources. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:28, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Adhisaya Ulagam 3D without prejudice as a bit premature. The Deacan Chronicle tells us this Tamil film is in post-production, and we can wait to see if it gets more coverage upon release. No need for Salt quite yet. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:05, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.