Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakran's Law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:58, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shakran's Law[edit]

I had this up for prod, but the creator removed the tag without explanation. It's a non-notable protologism that's not in common use (one hit on google). It violates WP:NOT, and thus should be deleted. Colin Kimbrell 17:43, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable protologism similar to but not nearly as well known as Godwin's Law. I get exactly 1 google hit and zero usenet hits. JoshuaZ 19:10, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Save !! Article provideds accurate and timely description of an emerging and already frequent technique designed to divide and end discussion, rather than to advance it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.56.3.182 (talk • contribs) host

Comment the above comment was actually made by an anonymous IP. JoshuaZ 19:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Forumcruft. NN protologism named for nn poster on nn forum. Trifecta. Fan1967 19:49, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as protologism --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 21:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As a TFP forum member, this is not a regular term even within the cited forum, as far as I have seen, much less a term with any kind of broad usage. It is self-promotion. Josh 23:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.