Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahriza Hussein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 04:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shahriza Hussein[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD declined on the grounds that there seemed to be a feature in the Star. However I'm unable to find that feature or any other indication Hussein met NAUTHOR/ACADEMIC or the GNG. Star Mississippi 19:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 19:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 19:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 19:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Copying note from Talk page. Thank you, VarlamTikhonovich for your comments and link to further resources. I'm including a link here so they're seen as part of the discussion and no one misses your input. Star Mississippi 23:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 23:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Been more than a decades since death and I can't find any coverage as well that would make the person notable. Dear Debasish (talk) 08:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I found the Star feature and added some other references too. Mujinga (talk) 02:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:26, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete New refs are not adequate secondary. RemotelyInterested (talk) 15:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG, Hussein's only(?) book, Legacy, held in under 20 libraries which doesn't bode well review wise, a gsearch under "legacy by "Shahriza Hussein" book reviews" brings up zero reviews additional to The Star reviews/obituary already in the article, as the author of the Star obituary was close enough to refer to him as "uncle" (and helped to prepare the body for funeral arrangements) and Hussein was a regular writer for The Star, i have WP:COISOURCE concerns with these, similarly with the Victoria Institution piece (he was an alumnus), and the 4th reference is from his book publisher. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:54, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.