Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahla Kareen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shahla Kareen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, notability tag since 2010, no claims supporting notability, no success with google search, except minor non speaking roles in short independent films. Fails WP:ANYBIO, does pass WP:HOTTIE Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 01:01, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:02, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:02, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. While this may well change in the future, her short career currently fails WP:ENT and lack of coverage fails WP:GNG. Allow back if/when this changes. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:34, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is the minimum number of sources needed to establish notability? At least there are some sources. Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 10:48, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the points made above, not notable other than the fact she is an actress who has found some work! --Phazakerley (talk) 08:38, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.