Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahbaz music videos
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy A7 by Anthony.bradbury. Non-admin closure. Tevildo (talk) 16:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Shahbaz music videos[edit]
- Shahbaz music videos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Not clear how this company meets notability guidelines, lacks any references RadioFan (talk) 13:54, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Web search only yields a YouTube hit. This one seems unrelated. Nothing on news search. Favonian (talk) 13:59, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete: I got the same result as Favonian. Joe Chill (talk) 14:05, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:ORG
- Speedy delete. The article itself says the company was just started. It easily meets WP:CSD A7 and I've just nominated it for speedy deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:14, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I just declined the speedy - as a contested PROD the article is not eligible for WP:CSD. Nancy talk 15:13, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see any basis in the guidelines for this reasoning, so I'm treating it as a mistake of procedure and I restored the CSD, with an explanation. Please let me know if there's a basis in the guidelines for not permitting speedy deletion because someone else happens to have posted a PROD (perhaps not realizing the a speedy would have been applicable) and then the page's author didn't like the fact that a PROD had been posted and removed it. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:08, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Something Made Up at Work One Day. A lot of claims, but no sources to back them up. It looks like someone is trying to use Wikipedia to become notable. It doesn't work that way. Become notable first, then come back here. DarkAudit (talk) 15:20, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.