Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shah Noorani accident

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ without prejudice against early REFUND if newly found sources establish WP:LASTING. Owen× 14:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shah Noorani accident[edit]

Shah Noorani accident (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia isn't a newspaper. All the sources provided are from time of event. No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT —Saqib (talk | contribs) 16:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Admittedly, the nominator's assertation makes no sense (it happened two days ago - sustained coverage is literally impossible, it's still a breaking event), but given the media landscape in Pakistan I really, really doubt this will have long term coverage. Most accidents like this don't have long term coverage even in Western countries. There's not really anything to be "analyzed", it wasn't on purpose - what would be said about this in the future? I doubt it would have much impact law-wise even in the west. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We all knows this was a road accident. But why should we keep this page? --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 07:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We don't create articles for every road accident. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:N and WP:NEVENT with only brief news coverage. There's no "road accidents are assumed notable until proven otherwise". We can say any event might have significant coverage later, but that doesn't mean we should create an article for every news story we find. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 (talk) 17:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.