Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shagufta Baig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shagufta Baig[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Baig has dubbed a lot of roles, but dubbing roles is generally not enough to show gain notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 20:06, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Poor nominations rationale. Dubbing roles can be plenty notable depending on volume and sources. The question is not if dubbing roles are notable, but if this individual has enough reliable third party coverage to display notability by either by themselves or by being associated with those roles. On the face of it, I think it would be a struggle to show notability for someone dubbing into Hindi but that also raises the question of why would need an article for them on En.Wiki. Still, any deletion should be made on arguements about the notability of the individual and not a predetermined opinion on the notability of dubbing roles. Given the number of times people have made this claim in the last few months, the distinction has proven important to make. SephyTheThird (talk) 20:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This doesn't really have a chance to develop into a usable English Wikipedia article as there isn't even an equivalent article in Hindi or Urdu Wikipedia. I don't see any search results for her. The one source that is currently on there is behind a paywall and doesn't justify any of her information except possibly her birthdate, but can't see it, behind paywall, and it's for a live-action film not a voice-over dubbed film. It should also not be in the scope for WP:ANIME as she only dubbed some Pokemon episodes to her local language and isn't known as an anime voice actor. This could be reconsidered if she has an article on the other Wikipedias that can be well-sourced and not just to cite episode closing credits. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now As no credible deletion rationale has been presented. AusLondonder (talk) 16:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It should be the other way around. No credible WP:RS sourcing that shows notability has been presented. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:46, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 05:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I searched a lot but there are no reliable sources. I cannot even find sources to verify any of the credits. At this time, this should be deleted. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unfortunately, despite my best efforts, I was unable to find much coverage in either Hindi or English (the English search resulted mostly in false positives). I did find one or two hits in Hindi but they don't really appear to be enough to establish notability. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.