Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shafiqah Shasha (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shafiqah Shasha[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO. i could not find significant coverage. In the last AfD, none of the keep voters actually gave coverage. Also links to very few articles LibStar (talk) 15:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails the WP:GNG. I couldn't even find an independent source confirming her existence, let alone significant coverage. The only source listed is Lucknow - A Veritable Goldmine, a book about a town that doesn't even have its own Wikipedia article. There is nothing about her life that suggests more/better sources are likely to be found. IgnorantArmies (talk) 11:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:26, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, "Lucknow: a small village approximately 9 kilometres (5.6 mi) east of Orange.[10] It is a historic mining town with small residential, small industrial and commercial with most being farmland.", from wikiarticle on Orange, New South Wales, that exists, so could have an article, just saying. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 00:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:22, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.