Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sh2-9

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 19:25, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sh2-9[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 06:41, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 06:48, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Perhaps you could also have a look here. Cheers, UnaToFiAN-1 (talk) 15:16, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the itwiki page linked above says that it's visible to the naked eye, which satisfies criterion 1 of WP:NASTCRIT. Article needs significant expansion, but the subject does appear sufficiently notable. creffett (talk) 02:09, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott Burley (talk) 07:19, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - looks like it can be expanded easily. Fotaun (talk) 00:15, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This object is visible to the naked eye. It can be expanded, though. Let me do a bit of expansion for it. SkyFlubbler (talk) 14:52, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, the nebula is very visible and surrounds Sigma Scorpii system. SIMBAD has the same designation of this nebula and Sigma Sco. Maybe I suggest we must merge it with that star article with a separate section? SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:09, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Its a lot easier to categorize if we leave it as a nebula article. Fotaun (talk) 16:39, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.