Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexyman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G3 Blatant hoax — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sexyman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No hits for this on Gnews. Also no hits for the supposed publisher. completely unreferenced. Not sure it isn't a hoax, but if it isn't it sure doesn't meet any standard of notability. WP:N, WP:GNG Gtwfan52 (talk) 02:26, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment And it was CSD'd while I was adding this. And it also appears that an article by the same title was CSD'd earlier today. In addition the user has a copy in his sandbox and has essentially recreated the same article at AfC under the title Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jason Brooks (Super Hero).Gtwfan52 (talk) 02:28, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:46, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:46, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per G3 as hoax. Mediran (t • c) 03:00, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.