Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual perfomance failure
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Robert T | @ | C 01:19, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sexual perfomance failure[edit]
Low content, subject covered at great length in other articles, such as Sexual dysfunction, with a misspelled title on top of it all. Jasmol 19:51, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nothing to merge, no point in a redirect. I'd have been tempted to speedy this one, were it not listed. (Anyone for a speedy-by-mass-acclamation?) Alai 20:16, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Wikipedia perfomance failure(sic). Durova 21:02, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above. TheMadBaron 22:27, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see why it would hurt to have a redirect to sexual dysfunction, but it's true that there's no salvageable content to speak of here. Jacqui ★ 00:54, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, unless it's an especially common misspelling, does it really aid navigation to have it? Alai 05:20, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- A redirect from the correctly spelled sexual performance failure would be useful though.
- Delete. Redundant. Nothing to merge. Poor redirect, IMHO. encephalon 01:32, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Encephalon --Rogerd 05:38, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.