Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual fidelity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Doc ^ask? 11:13, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Sexual fidelity

This is at best a candidate for wiktionary; as it stands it's an unencyclopædic personal essay. Delete. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:10, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and rewrite as it can be much more than a dicdef or an essay, though it is not currently. It would be interesting and encyclopedic, for example, to have an article that discusses sexual fidelity across cultures. —Cuiviénen, Sunday, 9 April 2006 @ 14:19 (UTC)
  • Delete, dicdef. Discussing sexual fidelity across cultures makes for much better magazine articles than encyclopedia entries. RGTraynor 20:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's a dicdef, and it's been around for a good long while, so I don't see it becoming anything more. Brian G. Crawford 15:18, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete but note in closing that the deletion was for the content (or lack thereof) rather than the subject matter, and the article could be recreated if done seriously. --Trovatore 15:32, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki: monogamy rather than fidelity... the two terms are not synonyms sounds perfect for wiktionary. Peter Grey 18:04, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.