Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex and the City 2 (film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xclamation point 06:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sex and the City 2 (film)[edit]
- Sex and the City 2 (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Premature article for a film which has only just been announced. Reliable sources state that the screenplay has not yet been written [1], so the article explicitly fails WP:NFF. Prod removed without explanation. PC78 (talk) 11:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC) PC78 (talk) 11:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 11:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Will be a fun film, undoubtedly, but has several more development and production hoops to jump through before it meets the inclusion criteria, as duly noted by PC78. user:j (aka justen) 12:01, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and per WP:CRYSTAL. ArcAngel (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete' without prejudice as article is premature. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Locked redirect to the first film's section on the sequel for now. It's been confirmed as to be filmed, and it will be recreated multiple times if it isn't protected. Nate • (chatter) 07:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.