Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex Drive (Video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Icewedge (talk) 02:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sex Drive (Video game)[edit]

Article tagged by The ed17 (talk · contribs) as being a possible hoax, no hits reported on google or on gamespot. Additionally, fails WP:N and WP:V on CRYSTAL grounds. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ATTENTION ALL USERS: The user who created this article had registered an inappropriate user name for the user account, and I subsequently blocked the guy on user name grounds after I notified the user in question of the afd. Therefore, if you see an isp address or a very new user editing this afd there is a chance it could be the article's author. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Hoax babee! §FreeRangeFrog 05:35, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, almost certainly a hoax. This article has just one new editor, and all related cross-ref entries at Sex Drive, Sex Drive (film) and 2009 in video gaming are by a single anonymous editor within 24 hours. Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 05:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 07:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unlike spinoff product of a sex comedy with the usual non-sources and unfound notability. Nate • (chatter) 10:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I can't even find a search on IGN. Versus22_talk 10:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Likely a hoax - even if it isn't there is no evidence of notability and no reliable sources to verify it. — neuro^(talk) 13:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete created by a user named "SexDriveVideoGame2009", so it's either a hoax or a massive COI violation. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 16:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per my tagging and my thoughts on the article's talk page. —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 01:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom as an obvious hoax. ArcAngel (talk) 18:30, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.