Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seventh Sanctum (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seventh Sanctum[edit]

Seventh Sanctum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is not notable, with a rank of 145,698 on Alexa. Zhangj1079 (T|C) 17:38, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 07:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 07:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NWEB. The website is not covered substantially in independent reliable sources. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:09, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: non-notable website, sources fail to indicate it passes WP:NWEB. DrStrauss talk 16:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.