Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven (rapper)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seven (rapper)[edit]

Delete nn musician fails WP:MUSIC Mayalld (talk) 20:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable, but underground musician. No myspace/music videos/national recognition/advertisements does not mean non-notable. Wilkos (talk) 20:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment actually, a lack of reliable sources discussing him does mean not-notable for Wikipedia purposes. Mayalld (talk) 20:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, being underground does not excuse an article from providing secondary sources. --fvw * 20:54, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wilkos, please read WP:MUSIC. Much of the criteria of the notability guidelines is dependent on reliable third-party coverage that supports any claims of notability you might make. Without it, the article should be deleted. TheLetterM (talk) 20:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. No. NO! NO! STOP IT! you're harassing me. Wilkos (talk) 21:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no reliable 3rd party sources. JamesBurns (talk) 01:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 00:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if sources arrive. Are there any underground magazines that are notable? Else delete and suggest a business proposition. Xavexgoem (talk) 20:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. So far underground that he is invisible to any independant commentator. Good luck in the future, but at the moment there are no sources to show natability. I hope the "No. No No..." is not an indication of ability - we don't need another 2 Unlimited!Yobmod (talk) 12:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.