Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sevana (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 19:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sevana[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject has only had one mayjor label release therefore WP:SINGER isn't met and there is not enough in depth independent press coverage for WP:NBLP Ferkingstad (talk) 09:22, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:47, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:47, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:47, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jamaica-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:47, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Sufficient coverage for WP:GNG. One of nine likely bad-faith nominations in reaction to the deletion of the nominator's article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VIDA Select. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:03, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets GNG with plenty of WP:RS coverage [1] [2] [3] all of which already cited, I don't even need to do a WP:BEFORE search Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:53, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep per above, and more sources are available, e.g. this 2020 Vogue feature includes biographical and career information; Sevana: 'My best work yet' (Jamaica Observer, 2020, interview with WP:SECONDARY commentary). Beccaynr (talk) 23:42, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, there is sufficient reliable sources coverage for GNG.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 09:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets GNG per sources provided by Spiderone and Beccaynr. -Xclusivzik (talk) 14:45, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Part of a batch of dubious nomination from the same user who claims there's some sort of Taliban gang creating articles (see [4]). pburka (talk) 15:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.