Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Settlement Fight

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Settlement Fight[edit]

Settlement Fight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 16:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 16:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources. The sources that do pop up when "Settlement Fight" is searched are not related to the subject of this page. Meatsgains (talk) 18:08, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I created the article and I think it's fair to say that this was a mistake, especially in hindsight. With the only independent sources no longer being accessible and the game itself not even existing it's certainly not notable. SellymeTalk 18:10, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I don't see significant coverage in reliable sources. It looks like this never really got any attention from the VG reliable sources. There are no useful hits from the VG/RS search, and regular Google searches turn up little more than Wikipedia mirrors and unrelated hits. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as there's still nothing at all for any applicable notability, nothing to suggest the necessary improvements for its own article. SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.