Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Tucker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 15:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Seth Tucker[edit]
- Seth Tucker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable author. A brief list of links to publications does not help: to establish notability we need in-depth discussion of the subject's work, and the article doesn't supply any secondary references. I can't find any either, using "seth tucker" and "seth brady tucker". To the defenders: please look at WP:AUTHOR and explain how subject meets those guidelines. Drmies (talk) 15:50, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I cannot find any significant coverage about him or his works to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 14:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice - Pretty clearly a self-written bio. I wish Mr. Tucker good luck in his writing career. Carrite (talk) 01:49, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.