Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serra (Magic: The Gathering) (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Planeswalker. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:43, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Serra (Magic: The Gathering)[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Serra (Magic: The Gathering) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This character does not establish notability independent of Magic: The Gathering through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 17:59, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Planeswalker. While as usual TTN's nominations border on trolling (only things that talk about X talk about X, clearly we should delete X, tautologies are cool), this is indeed just fancruft. SnowFire (talk) 01:49, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - totally non-notable subject, plot only coverage. Deletion would also be appropriate, but despite the implausibility of the search term, redirects are cheap. --Simone 08:28, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Planeswalker Beyond the basic card info, I haven't found any authoritative sources online. Existence is verifiable, so redirect is best option, per WP:ATD-M. --Mark viking (talk) 06:07, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.