Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serial Diners of Toronto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Serial Diners of Toronto[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Utterly trivial tabloid material. Some of the refs are mere mentions. DGG ( talk ) 01:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 29. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 01:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non notable, purely local interest.TheLongTone (talk) 16:29, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't quite meet WP:GNG standards. And Adoil Descended (talk) 22:09, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:21, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:21, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:21, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete: I'm taking care to avoid I don't like it as an argument here, but I agree that this is pointless society gossip about a thoroughly non-notable topic. A group that tries to eat out at all the restaurants of Toronto is simply not a suitable topic for an encyclopedia article, even if they are continually written about in newspapers by society writers desperate to fill pages. Still, I don't think it's a catastrophe if this article survives the AfD. --Slashme (talk) 13:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.