Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serge Renko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. See WP:NPASR. Kurykh (talk) 02:10, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Serge Renko[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actor despite his 30 odd films I could find almost no in depth information about him. He had one starring role in a notable film but all the other roles seem to be secondary or in non-notable films. I think he fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG Domdeparis (talk) 17:14, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Leading role in | many notable films. The fact that he is a actor only in french films but still a leading actor in many pages on en wikipedia (not all are listed). Easily passes WP:NACTOR and also WP:GNG, here are some further sources [1] [2] [3] [4]. These sources include the Hollywood Reporter and British national newspaper The Independent. I know there are more sources so if needs be I can retrieve some of these, although I doubt anyone should make a case for delete. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Initially offered as speedy, speedy has been contested, with comments about the deletion made by Inwind at Talk:Serge Renko. --Dereckson (talk) 17:47, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:57, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.