Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sequoia Di Angelo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:24, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sequoia Di Angelo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. The article was created in mainspace after repeated rejections in AfC. Most of the "citations" are from un-reliable sources or links to the subject's work. Some pieces like this from Time is about Slim Thug and makes no mention of the subject, who published his book. This is an announcement about a book signing. This is essentially an interview using photos provided by the subject. This only mentions the subject because she talked to the newspaper in question. The subject is a publicist so it's not surprising she grabbed every bit of free media available. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete User clearly trying to game the system. Don't be fooled by the number of sources, as Chris's interpretation of the sources is spot on- looking at a selection of the sources, many of the sources only give a passing mention, some sources do not mention the subject at all and others are press releases. In what is probably an attempt to get by on the number of sources, even Amazon is cited as a source. jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:22, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom. Promotional. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 21:31, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.