Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Septim bloodline
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. For those advocating merge, the target doesn't exist. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Septim bloodline[edit]
- Septim bloodline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and as such is just an in-universe repetition of plot elements from the Elder Scrolls games. As Wikipedia is not a gameguide, and this is all duplicative, this can be safely deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:19, 28 November 2007 (UTC) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:19, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 23:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT, WP:FICT, etc. Fin©™ 17:43, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into a single section of Characters of Oblivion per WP:VG consensus. User:Krator (t c) 12:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge for reasons listed above. Rockhound (talk) 01:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge To very small part of main article. Mbisanz (talk) 03:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for reasons mentioned above; as Characters of Oblivion has been deleted there seems to be no appropriate target for a merge. The article has been transwikied to the Elder Scrolls Wikia. Miremare 03:30, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per reasons above and deletion of characters article. Pagrashtak 17:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.