Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sepia Tears ~midwinter's reprise~

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Ben – Salvidrim! ·  14:27, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sepia Tears ~midwinter's reprise~[edit]

Sepia Tears ~midwinter's reprise~ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was dePRODed once with no reason given. A search for sources reveals none from reliable sources, at least as recognized by Wikiproject Video Games, and it has no Metascore or recognized official critical reviews. It appears to be completely non-notable and fails WP:GNG. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:10, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I could not turn up a single RS on this one--just a single obscure and short blog post, obviously insufficient to establish notability. The links currently used to source the article are all commercial or development pages, not reliable sources, and not independent of topic. Snow let's rap 12:37, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I did find two articles by Hardcore Gamer and Siliconera, but not enough to meet the GNG.--IDVtalk 10:42, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.