Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sensory participant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sensory analysis. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sensory participant[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure what this is. It looks like it is copied directly from whatever that source is, and whatever is or could be covered here could easily be covered in Sensory analysis. United States Man (talk) 23:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. It's a plausible search term. Bearian (talk) 21:36, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - probably to Sensory analysis. This may be useful information if presented correctly, but no reason why information on participants in a particular type of study shouldn't be included in the article on that type of research. Good faith effort by a new contributor, but they haven't quite gotten the hang of article creation yet, and seem to be creating a lot of new article that should probably be sections instead. TimothyJosephWood 14:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.