Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sengottai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, article about a real town; nomination withdrawn. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sengottai[edit]

This article about a place in India was clearly written by a few users who are unfamiliar with how to write a good article on Wikipedia. I am not making a statement about the notability of the place. However, as it stands, the article needs a complete overhaul at the very least. If an expert on the geography of India can shed some light on this, that would be great; otherwise, it may need to be deleted. YechielMan 21:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note - this kind of problem is often best handled by the {{cleanup}} tags, or, at most, a {{prod}}, in my experience going through some pretty bad pages at WP:DEAD. Part Deux 21:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
keep and clean from looking at the what links here, it appears to be part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject India. Nobody is asserting that it is inaccurate or un-notable so I say keep it and try and get it cleaned up (maybe add a wikify tag as well) it's on the Wikipedia:Dead-end pages/L-Z so should be getting some attention soon. Jeepday 01:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Real places are notable and a simple google search reveals that this is a real place [1]. I think it's the same place as Shenkottai though I could be wrong. Also, this nomination is not a proper use of AfD. cab 03:23, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I blew it. I spent a half hour trying to clean up the article, but someone beat me to it (edit conflict!) and did a better job anyhow. I don't make mistakes very often, but I made one in this case. Let's put a speedy keep on this article and move on. YechielMan 04:18, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.