Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seneca Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seneca Mall[edit]

Non-notable dead mall in New York, page is mainly a list of the many anchor stores it had. A search for sources online turned up none. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletions. —Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable at all. Malinaccier (talk • contribs) 21:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - very notable to followers of the Sattler retail chain. 2Cites provided w/ more available if requested. This mall was responsible for putting another out of business, and thus, an important piece of local history/timeline. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 03:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- What does the chain have to do with the notability of this mall? Does any business that outs another out of business now have automatic notability? If so, we need to add a few million articles! Vegaswikian (talk) 22:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A smaller mall, with adequate reliable and verifiable sources to establish notability. Alansohn 04:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~Only one~~ None of the sources is actually about the Seneca Mall though. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per AlanSohn. Twenty Years 15:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are more relevant to Sattler's than they are to the mall. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 16:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Another small not notable mall. How does being 'very notable to followers of the Sattler retail chain' make it notable? Sources do not make it notable. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A search of Google News Archives comes up with enough potential sources to warrant an article. [1]. As you would expect, most of the potential sources are from the Buffalo News but it has been mentioned in other papers. Capitalistroadster (talk) 22:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.