Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senator Bordallo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Bordallo (surname). Daniel (talk) 04:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Senator Bordallo[edit]

Senator Bordallo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. This page is 99% a clone of Bordallo (surname), just with a job in the title. There is also absolutely no chance anyone would look for these two as Senator Bordallo, since Ricardo is notable as a Guam governor and Madeleine is his wife and a U.S house delegate. Consensus has usually leaned against Job+Surname pages in the past. --Quiz shows 07:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. --Quiz shows 07:19, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete neither of these two people would be primarily looked at as senator. One would be governor, and the other most likely as delegate or whatever exact title you would give her, or maybe first lady since she was also the wife of the governor. Since they are married to eachother, even the surname page that serves just to list the two makes no sense. The articles are linked without creating other articles to link them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:09, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - totally unneeded dab. Bearian (talk) 01:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Bordallo (surname). Since both of the entries were (local) senators at some point there is some merit to the search term. Going by the principle "redirects are cheap" is fine as long as the search term isn't misleading. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.