Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semi Jaupaj (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 07:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi Jaupaj[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

More than half of these references are WP:YOUTUBE. Other sources range from press releases (lack of a byline) / WP:ROUTINE to highly likely non-WP:RELIABLE. Aside from that, there's a lot of WP:ORIGINAL. TLA (talk) 08:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, Television, and Albania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with fire, at that. Got soft deleted last time due to minimal RfD participation and here it is with precisely the same problems as my last nomination for deletion in 2022: "Albanian singer of little notability. Been watching this for a while to see if any sign of improvement or abiding importance emerges. It hasn't. Hasn't won any music competition, no evidence of any music charting, no evidence of any enduring influence or impact. Coverage is skimpy social pages stuff, no in-depth coverage. Borderline, yes, but ultimately not a WP:GNG pass and not WP:MUSICBIO either." Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I tried limiting Gsearch to Albanian websites with .al, they all are celebrity gossip items [1] and all in English. Most of the article now has no citations so could be OR or simply a hoax for all we know. I'm not seeing notability. Could be too early, TOOSOON. Oaktree b (talk) 16:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.